Repositories and journals are they in conflict
Identifieur interne : 000F07 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000F06; suivant : 000F08Repositories and journals are they in conflict
Auteurs : David J. Brown [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Aslib Proceedings [ 0001-253X ] ; 2010-03-23.
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to bring together information on whether any evidence exists of a commercial conflict between the creation of digital archives at research institutions and by key subject centres of excellence, and the business of journal publishing. Designmethodologyapproach Relevant publications, including articles published in refereed books and journals, as well as informal commentaries on listservs, blogs and wikis, were analysed to determine whether there is any evidence of a commercial relationship. Findings Most of the published comments are highly subjective and anecdotal there is a significant emotional overtone to many of the views expressed. There is precious little hard evidence currently available to support or debunk the idea that a commercial conflict exists between repositories and journal subscriptions. The situation is made more difficult by the many technological, sociological and administrative changes that are taking place in parallel to the establishment of repositories. Practical implications Separating the key drivers and their impact is a major strategic challenge facing all stakeholders in the scholarly communication industry in future. Research limitationsimplications This is an important area which requires close monitoring the possible threat that the established journal publishing system could be eroded away by a new free scholarly information system needs attention. One significant study in this area is being undertaken by the PEER group, funded by the European Commission with hard evidence being collected by UCL's CIBER research group. The results from this impartial investigation will be very welcome. Originalityvalue The paper shows that relationship between repositories and journal subscriptions is vague.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/00012531011034955
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000010
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000010
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000A31
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000F09
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000F07
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Repositories and journals are they in conflict</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Brown, David J" sort="Brown, David J" uniqKey="Brown D" first="David J." last="Brown">David J. Brown</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F29897218F322C35E4986B66BA5021EDBFCC3253</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1108/00012531011034955</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F29897218F322C35E4986B66BA5021EDBFCC3253/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000010</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000010</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A31</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0001-253X:2010:Brown D:repositories:and:journals</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000F09</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F07</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F07</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Repositories and journals are they in conflict</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Brown, David J" sort="Brown, David J" uniqKey="Brown D" first="David J." last="Brown">David J. Brown</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research CIBER, Department of Information Studies, University College London, London</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Londres</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Londres</region></placeName><orgName type="university">University College de Londres</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Aslib Proceedings</title><idno type="ISSN">0001-253X</idno><imprint><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><date type="published" when="2010-03-23">2010-03-23</date><biblScope unit="volume">62</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="112">112</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="143">143</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0001-253X</idno></series><idno type="istex">F29897218F322C35E4986B66BA5021EDBFCC3253</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1108/00012531011034955</idno><idno type="filenameID">2760620201</idno><idno type="original-pdf">2760620201.pdf</idno><idno type="href">00012531011034955.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0001-253X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Purpose This paper aims to bring together information on whether any evidence exists of a commercial conflict between the creation of digital archives at research institutions and by key subject centres of excellence, and the business of journal publishing. Designmethodologyapproach Relevant publications, including articles published in refereed books and journals, as well as informal commentaries on listservs, blogs and wikis, were analysed to determine whether there is any evidence of a commercial relationship. Findings Most of the published comments are highly subjective and anecdotal there is a significant emotional overtone to many of the views expressed. There is precious little hard evidence currently available to support or debunk the idea that a commercial conflict exists between repositories and journal subscriptions. The situation is made more difficult by the many technological, sociological and administrative changes that are taking place in parallel to the establishment of repositories. Practical implications Separating the key drivers and their impact is a major strategic challenge facing all stakeholders in the scholarly communication industry in future. Research limitationsimplications This is an important area which requires close monitoring the possible threat that the established journal publishing system could be eroded away by a new free scholarly information system needs attention. One significant study in this area is being undertaken by the PEER group, funded by the European Commission with hard evidence being collected by UCL's CIBER research group. The results from this impartial investigation will be very welcome. Originalityvalue The paper shows that relationship between repositories and journal subscriptions is vague.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li><li>Grand Londres</li></region><settlement><li>Londres</li></settlement><orgName><li>University College de Londres</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><region name="Angleterre"><name sortKey="Brown, David J" sort="Brown, David J" uniqKey="Brown D" first="David J." last="Brown">David J. Brown</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F07 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000F07 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F29897218F322C35E4986B66BA5021EDBFCC3253
|texte= Repositories and journals are they in conflict
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |